Why do bad things happen to good people? It’s a question that I’ve heard thrown around a lot, to the point that it’s become a sour cliche. From my privileged, charmed perspective, the question only ever had theoretical relevance; it was a scientific wondering about the physics of cosmic justice. For the first time, I asked this same question today in a different way.
This afternoon I met with four patients who have been living with chronic illness. Each of them had a remarkable story to tell: of fear and courage, pain and comfort, dehumanization and dignity. They struggle with illness every day, every hour – whether it’s giving themselves insulin injections after meals, or spending three mornings per week in the hospital for dialysis, or living in constant fear of a tumour spreading. The patients that I met were amazingly resilient, and had developed methods to cope. But each of them had needed to adjust their expectations for their own lives. Especially with regards to work, diet, and partners.
Our objective this afternoon was to develop an appreciation for “illness” – the patient’s perceptions and experiences of disease. Everybody experiences disease differently, and it’s important to place disease within the context of a patient’s worldview and values. An overriding message from the patients today was that physicians often fail to do that. We don’t hear their stories; their explanations for why they suffer and how their illness fits into their overall story.
And illness can re-paint everything about people’s stories. It can change how they feel about themselves and their self-worth. It can bring crushing stigma upon them. It can test their relationships, sometimes beyond breaking point.
So I left asking, why do such illnesses happen to such people? And this time it was a question of despairing uncertainty. How can such injustice exist? Why do some people have to suffer so much in this life? Why do I have so many free choices about my life, while others have few?
Let’s suppose the probability of being diseased is evenly distributed. Let’s suppose the set of good people are represented by G and bad people with B.
Now, let’s assume that |G| > |B|. Note that both G and B are (strict) subsets of human population, H.
Thus, we can conclude that the probability of picking (at random) an element in G is greater than picking an element in B.
Thus, “bad things happen to good people” because of statistics.
Comment by Matt K — September 26, 2008 @ 12:53 am
Wow, I ask those questions about the poor but they are just as relevant about people with illnesses. Sometimes we take our daily health so much for granted. Thanks for the reminder not to do that. Was just thinking as I watched Grey’s last night, I wonder how many patients actually do talk to they physicians and tell their stories…I mean their whole stories. And you’re right that is so important to the whole picture…take it from Grey’s
Comment by Miriam Booy — September 26, 2008 @ 5:15 pm
So, always one for compassion: “Why do you call me good?” Jesus answered. “No one is good—except God alone. => No one is good, and bad things do not happen to good people
@ M-K@$H
Do you think that taking diseases as random events is realistic? I think it is much more of a conditional probability: P(sick | GENES=genes, AMT_SLEEP=amt_sleep, STRESS=stress) (where ‘,’ denotes a joint probability, and obviously I am leaving out important factors…)
Pool Booy: Do you think that you could _win_ some prize if you could figure out the probability distribution of sickness? Just wondering
Comment by Anonymous — September 26, 2008 @ 10:52 pm